Chapter 1
In 1994, a group of notable evangelicals and Roman Catholics issued a
statement of cooperation entitled, "Evangelicals and Catholics Together:
The Christian Mission in the Third Millennium." The document has provoked
numerous articles and books assailing the evangelical signatories to the
accord.
The present author has surveyed many of the responses to ect, but he has
come away with mixed feelings. So far, most of the critics of ect take aim at
areas where Rome is an easy target; but they avoid critical aspects of doctrine
and practice where modern evangelicals exhibit remarkable similarities to Rome.
There can be no question that the ect document represents a colossal
compromise with Rome on the part of any professing Protestant who supports it.
Moreover, the accord and its aftermath reveal much about the present state of
evangelicalism. In particular, the situation demonstrates that most
evangelicals have departed from the doctrines and practices of the Protestant
Reformation.
We take this opportunity to focus upon the preeminent issues of the
Reformation. The present essay seeks to redirect the focus of readers to the
bigger picture, providing a framework for assessing Roman Catholicism,
contemporary evangelicalism, and the ect document. This book illustrates how
both Romanists and evangelicals have rejected scriptural teaching about (1.)
the essence of the gospel, (2.) divinely-instituted worship, and (3.) the marks
of a true church. By corrupting the gospel, worship, and the church,
evangelicals and Roman Catholics together are making shipwreck of the Christian
faith.
Our study will mention some of the specious beliefs and practices of both
Roman Catholics and evangelicals. When confronted with the unbiblical practices
of Rome, Protestants often assume that there is a prior misunderstanding of
doctrine which leads to a corresponding corruption in practice. Protestant
theology moves from thought to practice, so that is the way Protestants tend to
analyze the religion of others. Yet, this reasoning (from anterior belief to
posterior practice) does not always apply to Roman Catholicism; and it is
increasingly unserviceable when dealing with evangelicals. The fact is,
aberrant practices often obtain admission and long usage in religious
assemblies before anyone seeks to provide a rationale for them. When a practice
is subsequently questioned, latter-day apologists scurry to devise a
justification for their actions. This ex post facto method of building a rationale is what leads to some
of the bizarre scripture -twisting so prevalent in Rome and modern
evangelicalism.[1]
As our analysis proceeds, we will criticize some of the established
doctrines and practices of both Romanists and evangelicals. It is not our
desire to create animosity, but our commitment to sola scriptura requires that we candidly examine the beliefs and
practices of all parties in this controversy.
The sober reality is that ect is merely the tip of the iceberg. Both Roman
Catholics and evangelicals are making shipwreck of the faith. If there is going
to be a recovery of biblical religion in our land, we must repent and return to
the scriptural principles which marked the Protestant Reformation.
Footnotes for Chapter 1
1. See the comments by Richard Whately, cited by William
Cunningham, "The Errors of Romanism," in Discussions on Church
Principles: Popish, Erastian, and Presbyterian
(1863; rpt. Edmonton: Still Waters Revival Books, 1991), pp. 15-18.
Copyright ©1995 by Kevin Reed