"But
God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, Even when
we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are
saved;) And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly
places in Christ Jesus: That in the ages to come he might shew the exceeding
riches of his grace in his kindness toward us through Christ Jesus." -- Ephesians 2:4-7
June 22, 2002 -- Too often we
are not willing to ask the questions that cut to the root of the issues of the
day. Our attentions are seized by shiny rocks and relics, by petty debates and
well concocted mysteries -- so that, in the end, the greatest of all deceptions
slides under the door unnoticed.
In the grand debate over whether
homosexual, pedophilic priests should be demoted or defrocked, we are loathe to
ask the deeper question: Do Catholics go to heaven? Or deeper still, Are YOU
Catholic?
While Protestants silently
chortle over the convulsions within the world's largest cult, few are willing
to recognize that Catholic doctrine has so overwhelmed the
"protestant" religion, that there is not a dimes worth of difference
between the two. Why should we be shocked that the priests of the papacy are
fondling boys behind closed doors, when they have boldly molested Protestant
Church doctrine for the last several hundred years?
Excuse me Bishop Pedofili, can
we see BOTH of your hands?
Behold, the Ultimate Conspiracy.
While "remnant" Christians and patriots pour through the voluminous
documentations of a wicked "New World Order", a far more heinous
conspiracy marches forward unnoticed. In the confusion caused by the frantic
attempt to expose the growing menace of fascistic globalism, the opponents of
that antichrist system have willingly embraced the very theology of Antichrist.
We must start with some history,
and there we will find the fingerprints of the last days Great Deception.
Gather around and we will unveil the web of mystery and deceit that has
ensnared the churches of the world.
The Jesuits (or, the Society of
Jesus) are a Catholic order founded by the Spanish priest Ignatius Loyola, and
ordained by Pope Paul III in September of 1540. Loyola had experienced
continuing mystic "visions" beginning in 1523. In the visions, it was
revealed to Loyola that he was to be the originator and the master of a grand
army that would do battle with what he considered Babylonian hordes. Originally
he believed that the enemy he was to battle was the Mohammedans (Muslims), but
upon visiting Jerusalem and finding that his enemy was too great to overcome,
he came to the conclusion that his enemy MUST be the Protestants. Loyola firmly
believed that he had received this vision and this charge from the Blessed
Virgin herself, so on the 15th of August in 1534, he, along with his disciples,
traveled to the subterranean chapel of the Church of Montmartre, at Paris
(which had been consecrated to Mary) where they pledged their services to the
Pope, however he might choose to use them. The day was chosen because it was
considered by Catholics to be the anniversary of the Assumption of the Virgin.
Loyola had prepared a book
entitled "Spiritual Exercises". This was a rule book by which men
could learn to work out their own "conversion". Through a mystic
recipe, a penitent could utilize his mind, and by going through successive
"exercises" he could be created into a "converted" warrior
for the Pope. The Jesuits believed the claims of Loyola that the
"exercises" was a book actually written by the finger of God, and
delivered to Loyola by the Mother of God. Let us be perfectly clear, the order
of Loyola truly believed that "conversion" could be affected upon
oneself, and this put them in violent opposition to the doctrines of the
Apostles as preached by the Protestant reformers.
The oath of the Jesuits to serve
the Pope according to his pleasure, along with Loyola's vitriolic hatred of the
doctrines of Grace, inevitably would lead to the Jesuit mission to effect a
"counter-reformation" by declaring war on the true Christian faith.
This mission is reflected in this excerpt of the Jesuit oath:
"I
furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, make and
wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and
Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the
face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition;
and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous
heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants'
heads against the walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done
openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the strangulating cord, the steel
of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or
authority of the person or persons, whatever may be their condition in life,
either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent
of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of
Jesus".
And so, by command (they
believed) of the co-redemptress Mary, the Jesuits set out to use any and all
means to attack and destroy the idea of salvation by Grace. The ultimate
conspiracy was born.
The centerpiece of the
reformers' doctrine was out of the letter to the Ephesians. Paul had written,
"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it
is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are his
workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before
ordained that we should walk in them." These verses, when read in their
proper context, are odious to all those whose pride will not allow them to
receive imputed righteousness. The scriptures plainly claim that: a) we are the
workmanship, and not co-workers in our salvation, b) that those good works that
are done by us, are not ours, but the works of God worked out through us, c)
and that our salvation (including our faith) is a gift of God, and cannot be
claimed as a "salary" or a reward for our good works.
What was worse for Loyola and
his Catholic cohorts was that the people were beginning to receive the Bible in
their "vulgar" tongues, and the doctrines of Grace were now being
made evident to even the most ignorant of peasants. That the same book of
Ephesians claimed (in Chapter 2, verses 5) that God had quickened his elect
"Even when we were dead in sins", further complicated things for the
Catholics. Because it was evident to even the uneducated ploughboy, that a
sovereign God was totally responsible for salvation and redemption, and that
those who had gained the inheritance (of salvation), had gained that
inheritance by being "predestinated according to the purpose of him who
worketh all things after the counsel of his own will" (Ephesians 1:11).
It was in 1536, two years after
Loyola and his gang made their oaths in the church in Paris, that William
Tyndale was martyred as a heretic for, among other things, denying the freedom
of the will and for publishing the New Testament in English.
The Council
of Trent, 1545
In 1545, the Council of Trent
was convened by Pope Paul III. In this Council, the Catholic Church adopted a
stance on Justification that was blatantly contrary to the scriptures. In Canon
9 of the Council, the church declared, "If any one saith, that by faith
alone the impious is justified; in such wise as to mean, that nothing else is
required to co-operate in order to the obtaining the grace of Justification,
and that it is not in any way necessary, that he be prepared and disposed by
the movement of his own will; let him be anathema." During the Council,
the Jesuits were ordered by the Pope to make war, silently and openly against
the Reformation.
Planting
Poison in the Well -- Jacobus Arminius.
The Counter-Reformation was in
full swing. Jesuit spies and agents began to infiltrate Protestant schools, and
actually landed on the coast of the United States in the 1530's and the 1540's.
In order to defend the Romanist religion, as well as the Pope (who Catholics
are taught is actually "Christ on earth"), the Jesuits began their
war plan for a battle on many fronts, but a full attack on the Doctrines of
Grace would be necessary if Rome was to ever prevail. In 1560, unknown to the
Jesuits, one of their greatest proponents was to be born in Holland. His name
was James Harmenszoon, but he would come to be known as Jacobus Arminius.
Arminius lost his family during
a war with the Spanish in 1575. As a fifteen year old orphan, he entered the
University of Leyden, and under scholarship by the government of the City of Amsterdam,
he was sent to the Theological school in Geneva for studies at the feet of the
great reformers. At Geneva, Arminius studied under a professor named Theodore
Beza, the man who had assumed the leadership role of the Protestant movement in
Switzerland from John Calvin. For some reason that seems to be lost to history,
Arminius did not like Beza, and found his forceful defense of the Doctrines of
Grace to be harsh and unyielding.
Here is where our mystery gets
increasingly interesting. Back in Amsterdam there was a movement of
"counter-reformation" begun supposedly by a rich merchant named Dirck
Coornhert. Coornhert was a Dutch humanist who was enamored with the teachings
of the Catholic humanist Erasmus and a Spanish Jesuit monk named Luis de
Molina. Coornhert disdained the reformation teachings on Grace, and sought to
confront them wherever he found them. Coornhert had read with growing
affections the teachings of de Molina regarding Free Will and Predestination.
The Jesuits had hit on a brilliant way of dismantling the debate, they would
preach that BOTH were true, and that a good God who was truly sovereign surely
might have given his creations a freedom of the will in order to allow them to
choose to be saved. Luis de Molina was creating a doctrine that would
eventually be called Media Scientia or "Middle-Knowledge". Eventually
this heresy would be called Molinism. In an article on Luis de Molina entitled,
Contending for the Faith, Rev. Bernard Woudenberg said of de Molina,
"Being a Romanist, he was forced to honor the theology of Thomas Aquinas
with its acceptance of divine sovereignty, but at the same time, as a Jesuit,
he was committed to defending the papacy against the growing influences of
Calvinism. And so de Molina set forth to steer between these by proposing his
original and highly influential concept of the media scientia, or "middle-
knowledge." In this he proposed that "between God's knowledge of the
cause and effect relations which He had implanted in the universe, and that of
divine freedom whereby He remains free at any time to do what He wills, there
is an area of middle-knowledge which God provides for man in which man is
granted freedom to do whatever he chooses without outside necessity or
predetermination of any kind." The Hegelian dialectic was in full force.
The Catholic lie on justification had been countered by the true doctrine of
Salvation by Grace through faith, so an evil "compromise" was now
offered to the reformed churches, and by deceit and subterfuge, the compromise
would eventually become the predominant teachings in all the churches of the
world.
Back in Geneva, Theodore Beza at
this time had reason to suspect that his student Jacobus Arminius was not what
he proposed to be. Questions were being asked about comments that Arminius was
making to fellow students, and there were still questions about his support
from the rich, aristocratic merchants of Holland. Apparently Arminius was able
to lie well enough to get past Beza's questioning, a skill that would come in
handy years later when he would be looking for a teaching job in Amsterdam.
Beza then asked Arminius to answer and refute the teachings of Dirck Coornhert.
Although Arminius completed the task, he later claimed to be convinced by
Coornhert's arguments, and he became ardently opposed to the teachings of the
reformers. In 1586, Arminius was released from Geneva, but instead of heading
back to Amsterdam where he was under contract to the City to labor in order to
pay back his tuition, he headed to Rome for a "vacation".
Generally, most Calvinists
believe that it was during this time in Rome that Arminius was recruited by the
Jesuits to their point of view. That allegation cannot be proven, and I believe
that there is enough other evidence that Arminius was compromised long before
his pilgrimage to Rome. By this time, he had become a private student of the
writings of de Molina, and in 1588, the same year in which Arminius was
ordained a minister (by the endorsement of Beza), de Molina published his
treatise on the will entitled A Reconciliation of Free Choice with the Gifts of
Grace, Divine Foreknowledge, Providence, Predestination and Reprobation. What
the Jesuits were loathe to admit, was that Molinism was nothing more than a
rebirth of the ancient Pelagianism heresy, although it actually more easily
likened to "Semi-Pelagianism" which contends that man cannot be saved
apart from God's grace; however, fallen man must cooperate and assent to God's
grace before he will be saved. The Jesuits recognized that the Protestants would
never embrace the teachings of a Catholic Spanish monk, so they capitalized on
the growing and open debates taking place within Protestantism. Molinism would
be recast as Arminianism, and eventually, it would take over the ecclesiastical
world. A famous quote from de Molina eerily fortells of the Jesuit lie that
proceeds from the mouths of "evangelical" leaders today: "all
human beings are endowed with equal and sufficient divine grace without
distinction as to their individual merits, and that salvation depends on the
sinner's willingness to receive grace". The Catholics say of Molinism:
"Molinism is an influential system within Catholic theology for
reconciling human free choice with God's grace, providence, foreknowledge and
predestination. Originating within the Society of Jesus in the late sixteenth
and early seventeenth centuries, it encountered stiff opposition from Bañezian
Thomists and from the self-styled Augustinian disciples of Michael Baius and
Cornelius Jansen." - Alfred J. Freddoso, Catholic Professor at Notre Dame
Upon returning to Amsterdam in
1590, Arminius married the daughter of one of Holland's wealthiest aristocrats.
To see how far Jacobus had fallen from his original reformed ideals, we note
that in 1591, he was hired by his wealthy benefactors to draw up a church order
that would subordinate the church to a place of dependence and obedience to the
state. That particular belief is now the most prevalent abuse of both
Christians and the scriptures taught in "churches" today. The policy
of abusing Romans 13 for the purposes of enslaving Christians to tyrannical
civil magistrates had found a hero in Jacobus Arminius. The Catholic church,
even today, admires Arminius. Here is what it says about him in the Catholic
Encyclopedia: "A leader was sure to rise from the Calvinistic ranks who
should point out the baneful corollaries of the Genevan creed, and be listened
to. Such a leader was Jacobus Arminius (Jakob Hermanzoon), professor at the
University of Leyden." -- Catholic Encyclopedia
In the early 1590's, Arminius
had become an acquaintance and some would say an admirer of a Jesuit named
Cardinal Robert Bellarmine. Bellarmine was engaged in one of the other
battlefronts of the war on the Reformation. At the time, one of the biggest
battlefields for the Jesuit army was in the area of eschatology. As Christians
around the world began to read the Bible for themselves, it became evident to
many of them that the Catholic Church figured prominently in prophecy. The
teaching that the "Mystery, Babylon the Great, Mother of Harlots" of
Revelation 17:5 was actually the papist Church of Rome was gaining steam. In
1590, a Jesuit named Francisco Ribera had begun to write commentaries
explaining away those scriptures that plainly taught of the Catholic Church as
an element of the Anti-Christ system. Specifically, Ribera wrote a commentary
in 1590 that placed a whole new "spin" on Daniel 9:27. Ribera became
the first theologian in over 1500 years to teach that the "he" in
Daniel 9:27 who confirmed the covenant and put an end to sacrifice was actually
"antichrist" and not the Messiah. It had been the uniform teaching of
the church since the death of Christ that the "he" who had put an end
to all sacrifices on the Cross was Jesus Christ. But the Jesuits needed to
create a NEW antichrist, one that was not so easily identified with Rome. By
creating the concept of a seven year tribulation, transported way into the
future, Ribera was able to divert attention from the most blatant antichrist
that had his seat in Rome. Ribera's ideas were taken and expanded by Cardinal
Robert Bellarmine who blatantly taught that Paul, John and Daniel had
prophesied nothing whatsoever concerning Rome. We might point out that
Bellarmine had a tendency to be famously wrong. It was Cardinal Bellarmine who,
as inquisitor, threatened Galileo so convincingly that the scientist recanted
of his findings that the earth actually moved around the sun! Bellarmine was
subsequently declared a "saint" by the Roman Church.
Stay with us, because this mystery
splits off in various and interesting directions.
In the late 1590's Jacobus
Arminius was back in Amsterdam, teaching his Pelagian/Molinist lies. Enough
questions had been brought forth concerning his anti-Grace teachings, that a strict
Calvinist by the name of Franciscus Gomarus was called upon to interview
Arminius to test his orthodoxy. Arminius was applying for a professorship in
Theology at the University of Leyden, and the occasion of his job interview
would allow his belief system also to be tested. Apparently, Arminius had
either become so skilled a liar or his skills in evasion and escape had become
so attuned by this point, that he passed the test with flying colors. The
question of why Beza and Gomarus, both strict Grace and Election adherents, had
both approved of Arminius is unclear, but both were likely blinded by their
belief in honor and integrity amongst theologians. During a time when men were
willing to die for their faith, the thought that someone would patently lie
about his beliefs in order to receive promotions and to avoid detection would
have been far from the minds of these two reformers. But lying and deceit were
well within the oath and charter of the Jesuits. We will see that these traits
are also widely accepted by the intellectual heirs of Jacobus Arminius.
Arminius died in 1609, long
before the upheavals caused by his teachings would erupt in full force. In
1610, the disciples of Arminius signed a "Remonstrance" or a petition
to the government for protection of their Arminian views. In their
Remonstrance, the Arminians put forth their theology finally for the entire
world to see. It consisted of five main points:
1.
Conditional election. The Remonstrants held to the Molinist view of
Middle-Knowledge. Election was conditional on both God's foreknowledge, and the
free will of humans.
2.
Universal atonement. The Remonstrants held to the Jesuit/Molinist view on the
atonement, as pushed by the Catholics in the Council of Trent. The redemptive
blood of Jesus Christ was available to all mankind, and God had not applied or
given this atonement to any specific "elect".
3.
Total depravity. The Remonstrants held on to the view of original sin, but
believed that since humans were HUMANS, and not sticks or plants, there was
enough human left in them to enable them to believe on Christ, or reject Him.
In effect, humans were not TOTALLY depraved.
4.
Sufficient but resistible grace. The Remonstrants believed that Grace was
sufficient to save, but that this Grace could be resisted by man. Thereby man
could thwart the will of God (which evidently was to save ALL men) by refusing
to be saved.
5.
Uncertainty about the perseverance of the saints. The Remonstrants believed
that a truly born-again believer could cast off that Grace by certain behavior
and subsequently go to Hell.
I will tell you that what you
have just read is the common teaching of the Protestant churches throughout the
world, with very few exceptions.
I will tell you that what you
have just read is the common teaching of the Protestant churches throughout the
world, with very few exceptions. I will also tell you that these beliefs,
commonly called "Arminian", are cogent, logical and ultimately WRONG.
I say that they are cogent and logical in order to tell you that the only thing
WORSE than the Arminian viewpoint, is any viewpoint that attempts to COMPROMISE
between these points and the Doctrines of Grace as taught in the Bible.
Challenges to the Doctrines of Grace are usually predicated by the attempt to
label them as "Calvinism", although Calvin AND Arminius were gone by
the time this Remonstrance was published. What the enemies of Grace term as
"Calvinism" or now the more hated "Hyper-Calvinism" was
actually just the Gospel response to the Remonstrance of 1610! It is as if a
man named Gomer created a new doctrine called GOMERISM, in which he proposed
that we all evolved slowly from dirt particles on the eyelids of gnats. If
another man named Goober published a biblical challenge to this stupid
doctrine, it is as if folks ran about for another 400 years preaching against
Gooberism (or worse, Hyper-Gooberism) as a contrivance of that heretic Goober!
In 1611, the true preachers of
the Gospel answered with the Contra-Remonstrance of 1611. Robert Godfrey
writes, "It it surely ironic that through the centuries there has been so
much talk of the 'five points of Calvinism' when in fact Calvinists did not
originate a discussion of five points. Indeed Calvinism has never been
summarized in five points. Calvinism has only offered five responses to the
five errors of Arminianism."
Let us return to our mystery.
The Jesuits were not done with
their work. Although they had planted the seeds of their papal tares in the
Lord's ground, they had not yet seen their crop come to fruition. In the
1700's, the doctrine of Arminianism would be fully embraced and rapidly
distributed by John Wesley, the founder of Methodism. Wesley wrote a defense of
Arminianism entitled, "What is an Arminian". The folly of Arminianism
was also challenged, and rightly so, by that Great Christian thinker Jonathan
Edwards, who published his treatise "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry
God" in 1741, a sermon that profoundly trounced the foolishness of
Arminian doctrine. Edwards became president of Princeton in 1758, but
"mysteriously" died of a smallpox vaccine within weeks (see the oath
of the Jesuit above).
In 1826 Dr. Samuel Maitland
(librarian for the Archbishop of Canterbury) wrote a book attacking the
Reformation. In it, he used the Jesuit Francisco Ribera's NEW interpretation of
Daniel 9:27 in order to defend the Papacy.
In the 1830's two movements
erupted that would play an important part in the unfolding mystery. One was the
"Oxford Movement". In 1850 John Henry Newman wrote his "Letter
on Anglican Difficulties". In it he revealed that the "Oxford
Movement" of which he was a part, had as its goal to finally absorb
"the various English denominations and parties" back into the Church
of Rome. After publishing a pamphlet endorsing the Jesuit view of Daniel 9:27,
Newman joined the Catholic Church and eventually became a Cardinal. The second
movement that burgeoned at the time was one led by John Nelson Darby, called
the "Plymouth Brethren".
At about the same time, there
appeared a Scottish Presbyterian minister named Edward Irving (the acknowledged
forerunner of both the Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements). Irving was
pastoring the huge Chalcedonian Chapel in London. He had readily accepted the
Jesuit prophetic teachings on Daniel 9:27 proposed by Maitland, and the Jesuits
Bellarmine and Ribera. Irving began to teach the unique idea of a two-phase
return of Christ, the first phase being a secret rapture prior to the rise of
the Antichrist. It is rumored that Irving received this prophetic
"revelation" when it was given in a vision to a young Scottish girl
named Margaret McDonald. McDonald's prophetic revelation vision is eerily
similar to the way that Ignatius Loyola received his vision of warfare against
the Protestants.
One of the leaders of the
Plymouth Brethren in Plymouth, England was a lawyer named John Nelson Darby.
Darby became the "Father of Dispensationalism", and used the
teachings on Daniel 9 by the Jesuits Ribera and Bellarmine as the foundation of
his rapture teaching. Darby is a great subject in our study of that poison in
the well. Although Darby taught many great things (he insisted on the
infallibility of the Bible, and voiced his opposition to the Catholic Church as
well as the formalism and manipulation in the Protestant Churches), he had
consumed the Jesuit bait, and in turn, he became the bait that would eventually
ensnare most of the "Christian" world. Darby visited America 6 times
in the late 1800's and by the close of that century, most of the denominations
had imbibed from the same poisonous Jesuit well.
SCOFIELD
By 1909, Arminianism and
Darbyism had infiltrated most of the denominations in America. That year, Cyrus
Scofield published his famous Scofield Bible. That Bible became the predominant
Bible used in the seminaries in America. In the margin notes, Scofield readily
accepted the dispensationalist teachings of J.N. Darby, and some of the other
Jesuit lies discussed here. As can be expected, by the middle of the 1900's,
most of the students graduating from America's seminaries were well indoctrinated
in both the Jesuit lies of Arminius, and the Dispensationalist hogwash of J.N.
Darby. By the end of that century, almost every church in America taught some
level of Arminianism and the predominant eschatological view was of a future
rapture followed by a seven-year tribulation. Both concepts were openly and
clearly Jesuit concepts pushed by the Society of Jesus in order to counter the
Doctrines of Grace.
DAVE HUNT
Dave Hunt is an author and Bible
commentator who has written about 30 books. Hunt was born in 1926 and was
raised in J.N. Darby's "Plymouth Brethren" denomination. Hunt was
clearly steeped at an early age in Darby's dispensationalist views, and he
would become an avid advocate of the Francisco Ribera teachings regarding
Daniel 9:27. According to Hunt, at some point he became disillusioned with the
"cessationist" views of his denomination, and, for a time, he became
enamored with the more charismatic views on scripture after reading the works
of William Law and Andrew Murray. But sometime during the 1980's it seems that
Hunt had come full circle to a more traditional Darbyist view on scripture.
As can be expected in any
conspiracy/mystery, there are twists and turns. In 1994, Dave Hunt wrote a book
entitled A Woman Rides A Beast, which taught the traditional reformed views of
the Catholic Church as to the woman in Revelation 17. By the middle of the
1990's, Hunt had become a favorite of both the anti-catholic reformed thinkers,
and the Darbyist dispensationalists. Hunt spent most of his time as a
"heresy hunter", cementing his position in the minds of most
Protestants as a defender of the faith. Once again, the Jesuit ploy was
working. The defenses were down, and Loyola's Marian war was about to come to
fruition.
WHAT LOVE IS
THIS? By Dave Hunt
What Love is This, by Hunt debuted just recently as Hunt's
defense of Arminianism. Sub-titled "Calvinism's misrepresentation of
God", Hunt pushes the Jesuit agenda to the hilt. In fact, in order to
deceive as many Protestants as possible, Hunt uses his Jesuit inspired book to
claim that the reformed doctrines of predestination and election are based on
Catholic Doctrine! Amazing! But deception wouldn't be deception unless it
worked.
To write the forward of the
Book, Hunt chose dispensationalist and rapturist author Tim Lahaye. LaHaye is
the millionaire best-selling author of the Left Behind series of books. Known
for their hokey theology and horrible scriptural gymnastics, the Left Behind
series has roped MILLIONS of people into the Jesuit theory of the end times.
LaHaye says this about Hunt's book:
"Dave Hunt… proves
Calvinism is not a Protestant doctrine, but is based in Greek fatalism brought
into the church in the fifth century by Augustine, paving the way for the
CATHOLIC DOCTRINE of predestination that all but destroyed Christianity and
then was picked up by Calvin and presented as Reformed theology."
Breathtaking. Hunt uses a
predictable ploy, and through it he is able to hoodwink most nominal Christians
who are too spiritually retarded and lazy to do any research on their own.
Let's lay it out like Hunt
does:
1.
Augustine was Catholic, therefore he believed in Catholic doctrines like
placing tradition on a level with scripture.
2.
Since Augustine believed in Predestination too, then anyone who believes in
Predestination is really Catholic.
Stupid, but it works on most
people. The fact that the Catholic Church in its Catechisms denounces
predestination and rejects the doctrine of election does not phase Hunt one
bit. The fact that the Catholic Church murdered and imprisoned the reformers
for their belief in election doesn't factor in either. The fact that Augustine
also believed in the Trinity does not cause Dave Hunt to challenge that
Biblical doctrine. Like his theological father Jacobus Arminius, it seems that
Dave Hunt is not above lying in order to forward his Jesuit doctrines.
So the trap is sprung and the
multitudes will fall prey to it. Hunt writes a book decrying Catholicism as the
evil woman of Revelation 17. Then Hunt writes another book turning truth on its
head and claiming that the doctrine of election is not a truly Christian
doctrine, but was concocted by the Catholic Church. Simple enough, right?
Must be, you ought to read my
email. I am attacked from both the Catholics and the so-called
"remnant" believers because of my insistence on the Doctrines of
Grace. I have received at least 20 letters from people who pompously claim that
they are neither Arminians NOR Calvinists, but in fact they are somewhere
"in the middle". The Media Scientia (Middle-Knowledge) of that Jesuit
monk de Molina has resurfaced from the poison pen of Dave Hunt, and the
doctrine has been embraced almost universally.
Not surprisingly, Hunt is also a
notable friend and partner with most of those who are deep into the ecumenical
movement. His buddy Tim LaHaye, who wrote the forward for his book, is on the
board of ECT (Evangelicals and Catholics Together).
Hunt declares that he is NOT a
"five-point" Arminian. He believes in the perseverance of the saints.
So we can not only affirm that Dave Hunt is a charlatan and a deceiver, but he
is also fundamentally illogical. Apparently Hunt believes that the freewill of
man is sovereign over the will of God in salvation, but that subsequent to
salvation, God abuses mans freewill by not allowing him to change his mind.
Catholic writer Robert W. Aufill
has this to say about Hunt: "Strangely, Hunt… does not realize that his
own emphasis on 'deciding for Christ' inescapably implies the possibility of
co-operating with the grace of justification -- a possibility the Reformers
constantly condemned but upon which the Catholic Church insists."
At least with Arminianism, we
had a logical and clearly defined enemy. Today, pride and avarice reign. Too
many people aren't willing to study these issues for themselves, so they fall
prey to millionaire charlatans with books to peddle.
Loyola's plan has come to
fruition. The Jesuit doctrines of anti-Grace have become the dominant teaching
of the churches of the world. The Woman that Rides the Beast, that mother of
Harlots, has seen her offspring grow up into maturity. The Whore churches that
dot every street corner have the stench of their mother.
Those people who are NOT
brain-addled and stupefied in the sugar-water Harlot Churches, are busy
decrying the evil of the coming New World Order, while in ignorance they
embrace the very doctrines of Antichrist.
It is the Ultimate Conspiracy,
and if it were possible, it would deceive even the very elect. Do Catholics go
to heaven? You better find out, because odds are you are one.
I am your servant in Christ
Jesus,
Michael Bunker
More
free books on Calvinism (the Sovereignty of God,
TULIP, etc.)
FOR FURTHER STUDY
In the history of the church's sanctification I don't believe there has been a more valuable extra-biblical resource and tool than the Puritan Hard Drive.
It holds some of the most priceless Reformed works of God-centered and Christ-glorifying truth that were ever penned.
Most students, ministers and scholars of the Bible would never personally acquire even half the literal number of books on the Puritan Hard Drive, much less the extreme caliber of its contents.
In God's providence modern day Christians have been chosen to be the recipients of both a theological and practical blessing. May we not squander it.
- Matthew McMahon, Ph.D. A Puritan's Mind
More
PURITAN HARD DRIVE REVIEWS
Visit Still Waters Revival Books new
state-of-the-art Web site at PuritanDownload.com by clicking here! The new
SWRB Web site features the best Reformation
and Puritan books starting at just 99 cents each (with no shipping costs)!
Also see the Puritan
Hard Drive Super Sale for the powerful and practical Reformation study tool
ever created.
"Still
Waters Revival Books... have released an incredible array of... compact disks
which contain over 2,000 titles of some of the best Reformation and Calvinistic
books ever written. It is by far the best and widest collection of Reformed
literature ever assembled...
more"
-
The Five Points of Calvinism: Defined, Defended, and Documented, Second (Special 40th Anniversary)
Edition, Updated and Expanded (p. 76, 2004, Presbyterian and Reformed
Publishing Company) by David N. Steele, Curtis C. Thomas, and S. Lance Quinn,
Foreword by Roger Nicole, Afterword by John MacArthur (emphases added).
Many of the books
listed in the following Super Sales are also available on the Puritan Hard Drive.
Sovereignty of God Sale
http://www.swrb.com/Puritan/sovereignty-of-God.htm
More free books on Calvinism (the Sovereignty of God, TULIP, etc.)
Westminster Confession of Faith Super
Sale
http://www.swrb.com/Puritan/westminster-confession.htm
PINK, A.W.
The Sovereignty of God
(Baker Book House edition)
This is the best contemporary
book explaining the foundations of Calvinism. This book is like a key that, by
God's grace, opens the door of understanding to some of the most blessed truths
in Scripture. From the myriad of testimonies that we have heard concerning how
God has used this book, we think that we can safely say that this is also the
best book to pass on to those that you want to introduce to Calvinism. This is
the full, unedited Baker Book House edition. Indexed.
Free MP3 audio book: The Sovereignty of God by A.W. Pink
On sale at: http://www.swrb.com/catalog/p.htm
The Sovereignty of God
(Banner of Truth Trust edition)
This is the edited Banner of
Truth edition of Pink's book.It leaves out the three following chapters:
"The Sovereignty of God in Reprobation;" "God's Sovereignty and
Human Responsibility;" "Difficulties and Objections." It also
does not contain the four following appendices: "The Will of God;"
"The Case of Adam;" The Meaning of "Kosmos" in John
3:16;""I John 2:2." However, it does contain some very helpful
editorial footnotes that the Baker edition does not contain.
This book is also available on
the Puritan
Hard Drive.
OWEN,
JOHN
A
Display of Arminianism: Being A Discovery of the Old Pelagian Idol of Free
Will, With the New Goddess Contingency Advancing Themselves Into the Throne of
the God of Heaven, to the Prejudice of His Grace, Providence, and Supreme
Dominion Over the Children of Men...
This was Owen's first
publication (1642) and immediately brought him into notice. It contains
numerous useful charts contrasting Arminian doctrines, from some of their major
teachers, with those of Scripture (Calvinism) in a side-by-side format.
Owen leaves no room for
compromise with Arminianism as he shows why this is, when sincerely believed, a
dangerous, devilish and damnable heresy! This position is simply in keeping
with Luther, as C.H. Spurgeon points out,
"...
and I will go as far as Martin Luther, in that strong assertion of his, where
he says, 'If any man doth ascribe of salvation, even the very least, to the
free will of man, he knoweth nothing of grace, and he hath not learnt Jesus
Christ aright.' It may seem a harsh sentiment; but he who in his soul believes
that man does, of his own free will turn to God, cannot have been taught of
God, for that is one of the first principles taught us when God begins with us,
that we have neither will nor power, but that He gives both; that he is 'Alpha
and Omega' in the salvation of men." (from the sermon 'Free Will A Slave,'
1855, also see Luther's Reformation classic, The Bondage of the Will, http://www.swrb.com/catalog/L.htm ).
On sale at: http://www.puritandownloads.com/swrb/products/A-Display-of-Arminianism-by-John-Owen.html
This book is also available on
the Puritan
Hard Drive.
NESS,
CHRISTOPHER
An Antidote Against Arminianism (1700)
Recommended by John Owen, John
Gill, and Augustus Toplady.
An easy-to-read but devastating
critique of the Arminian heresy.
A treatise to refute all five
points of Arminianism, setting forth predestination and the five points of Calvinism
clearly and forcefully, along with numerous Scripture proofs.
"As
blessed Athanasius sighed out in his day," writes Ness, "the world is
overrun with Arianism;' so it is the sad sigh of our present times, the
Christian world is overrun, yea, overwhelmed with the flood of Arminianism;
which cometh, as it were, out of the mouth of the serpent, that he might cause
the woman (the Church) to be carried away of the flood' thereof (Rev. 12:15).
And lest this overflowing deluge of Arminianism should bring destruction upon
us, there is great need that some servants of Christ should run to stop the
further spreading of this plague and leprosy."
This book will be a great help
in containing the contagion of this devilish delusion!
On sale at: http://www.swrb.com/catalog/N.htm
This book is also available on
the Puritan
Hard Drive.
This title focuses on the
doctrine of salvation, especially the five points of Calvinism. It contrasts
Calvinism with Arminianism throughout.
Wesley's distinctive positions
(aberrations) also receive much special attention -- including his views of
sanctification and original sin. One interesting anecdote, found in the chapter
"Wesley's conversion to Arminianism," reads:
"The
third and only other kind of lottery practised by Mr. Wesley, appears to have
been the toss of a piece of money. This brings up the way in which it is
charged upon him, that he decided to be an Arminian. Thus in a letter from the
Rev. Augustus Toplady to Mr. Wesley, in 1792, we meet withy the following, viz.
'Why should you, of all people in the world, be so angry with the doctrines of
grace? Forget not the months and days that are past. Remember that it once
depended on the toss of a shilling whether you yourself should be a Calvinist
or an Arminian. Tails fell uppermost, and you resolved to be an Arminian"
(p. 418).
430 pages.
On sale at: http://www.swrb.com/catalog/b.htm
This book is also available on
the Puritan
Hard Drive.
Baillie was one of the Scottish
commissioners to the Westminster Assembly. An exceedingly rare item, this book
was written as the storms of the religious wars between the Puritans and the
Prelates were beginning to blow. These were days when nations adopted overtly
religious presuppositions and books such as this became international defences
of gospel principles against the ecclesiastical (and political) forces of
Antichrist -- and his generation of vipers.
After rehearsing some of the
major incidents of Prelatical persecution against the saints of the most high
God, and calling to the English for support of the Covenanted cause of Christ,
Baillie gives this stirring summary of his motives in writing this book,
"behold
I here first upon all hazard do break my pitcher, do hold out my Lamp, and blow
my trumpet before the Commissioners of the whole Kingdom, offering to convince
that prevalent faction by their own mouth, of Arminianism, Popery, and
Tyranny."
These were brave and zealous
words, for in that day such speech could eventuate in your death.
This is not only a historically
relevant item, but also a fine defense against the prevailing heresies of the
flesh (heresy being a work of the flesh, cf. Gal 5:19-20). The two predominant
heresies addressed by Baillie in this book still cover much of the professing
Christian world today; these being:
(1.)
false, man-centered views of salvation (Arminianism and Pelagianism) and
(2.)
false man-centered views of worship (Liturgical innovationism: either high
church or Charismatic).
"Baillie fought hard
against Arminianism" noted Johnston (The Treasury of the Scottish
Covenant, p. 310);
making this book especially valuable for today!
This is the third edition of 128
pages, plus a 28 page postscript.
On sale at: http://www.swrb.com/catalog/b.htm
This book is also available on
the Puritan
Hard Drive.
For the
advanced study of Calvinism, as it impacts many areas of thought, we also
recommend the following free online books, MP3s and videos:
The Covenanted Reformation Defended
Against Contemporary Schismatics:
A Response and Antidote Primarily to the Neopresbyterian Malignancy and
Misrepresentations, and the Manufactured "Steelite" Controversy,
Found in Richard Bacon's A Defense Departed; With a Refutation of Bacon's
Independency, Popery, Arminianism, Anabaptism and Various Other Heresies
(Including an Exhibition of His Opposition to Scripture and the Covenanted
Reformation, in General; and His Opposition to John Calvin, John Knox, the
General Assembly of the Church of Scotland [Especially 1638-1649], Samuel
Rutherford, George Gillespie, the Testimony of the Covenanter Martyrs, the
Reformed Presbytery, the Puritan Reformed Church of Edmonton and a Host of
Other Prominent Reformers from Past Generations, in Particular) -- With Copious
Notes on Mr. Bacon's Backsliding and His Blackening of the Blue Banner; as Well
as Various Replies to Other Modern Malignants by Greg Barrow (Greg Price, Reg
Barrow, Larry Birger, et al.) (Though set in the context of a debate
with one individual, this book addresses a number of specific problems which
plague the Presbyterian and Reformed churches of our day in general. "It
conclusively and irrefutably demonstrates that those churches which today call
themselves Presbyterian [and even many which claim a more general Reformed
heritage] have grievously departed from the Scriptural standards and principles
of the previous Spirit led Reformations [of the 16th and 17th centuries]. This
will become progressively [and painfully] clear as the reader witnesses
evidence upon evidence of defection from biblically based Reformation
attainments (Phil. 3:16) -- and the burying and/or removing of the ancient
Reformation landmarks. Ultimately, when the testimony and evidence [presented
in this book] is weighed in light of Scriptural verities, it is entirely safe
to say that the original Reformers would not only have sought negative
ecclesiastical sanctions against our modern pseudo-Reformers, but in many cases
negative civil sanctions as well," writes Reg Barrow in the
"Publisher's Preface." This book, of over 300 [8.5" X 11"]
pages, is also offered as a cerlox bound photocopy [$14.98 US funds] or a
Hardcover photocopy [$25.00 US funds]. It is also free
on most of the CDs in the REFORMATION
BOOKSHELF CD set [30 CDs, http://www.swrb.com/Puritan/reformation-bookshelf-CDs.htm ])
Free on the web at: http://www.swrb.com/newslett/actualnls/CovRefGB.htm
Saul in the Cave of Adullam: A
Testimony Against the Fashionable Sub-Calvinism of Doug Wilson (Editor of Credenda/Agenda Magazine); and, for Classical
Protestantism and the Attainments of the Second Reformation by Reg Barrow
Doug Wilson and others at Credenda/Agenda used their magazine to publicly attack and slander Reg
Barrow (President of Still Waters Revival Books) in a column that they call the
"Cave of Adullam." This invective was Credenda's response to Barrow's comments on Knox
Ring (where Barrow noted that John Calvin would have excommunicated Jo hn Frame
for the apostasy that he manifests in his new book on worship). Numerous
private attempts were unsuccessfully made (by Barrow and others) to call Wilson
to repentance for this slander. Ultimately, charges for violation of the ninth
commandment were brought (in accord with Matt. 18:15-17) against Wilson by
Barrow. This book recounts the sa lient points of the controversy (and the
Matthew 18 proceedings) between Wilson and Barrow -- in their actual email
debates! Also included is Barrow's demonstration of why Calvin would have
excommunicated Frame and Greg Price's Testimony Against The Unfounded
Charges of Anabaptism. These
debates are a classic example of the differences t hat exist today between
paleopresbyterians (Barrow) and neopresbyterians (Wilson). Wilson's charges against Barrow, of
Anabaptism, separatism, etc. are all refuted under a mountain of quotations
from Reformation source documents. Barrow's refutations of Wilson's spurious
charges bring to light many aspects of Reformation thought that have been lost
or forgotten in our day. Besides the initial controversy (over Frame and
worship) and the restoration process (set forth in Matthew 18:15-17), this book
should be of special interest to all of those who love the "old
paths" of truth -- trod by our forefathers in the Reformed faith -- for
some of the most pressing issues of our day (regarding the individual, church
and state) are addressed herein. Classic statements, cited by Barrow, not only
exhibit the wisdom which God granted the best Reformers of both the first and
second Reformations, but also specifically demonstrate how Wilson and many
other modern Protestants actually reject the Reformation at many points (all
their protests n ot withstanding). "And they that shall be of thee shall build
the old waste places: thou shalt raise up the foundations of many generations;
and thou shalt be called, The repairer of the breach, The restorer of paths to
dwell in" (Isa. 58:12). This item is also available as a bound photocopy
for $3.98 (US funds) and a Hardcover photocopy for $14.98 (US funds).
Free on the web at: http://www.swrb.com/newslett/actualnls/Saul.htm
Paleopresbyterianism Versus
Neopresbyterianism
by Michael Wagner
Defines the major differences between "paleo" or old Presbyterianism
(the position held at the Westminster Assembly, 1648) and "neo" or
new (modern) Presbyterianism. Maintains and proves that the two major
differences are found in the form of subscription (whether complete, as with
the "paleo's," or loose [i.e. allowing for scruples], as with the
"neo's") to the Westminster standards and in whether or not the
Solemn League and Covenant is thought to be binding today (in its moral
equity). Wagner also demonstrates how the neopresbyterians have turned away
from the original Presbyterian position. The implications of this introductory
booklet are far reaching and revolutionary and could easil y shake the
prevalent neopresbyterian establishment (PCA, OPC, etc.) to its very core. This
item is also available as a bound photocopy for $2.39 (US funds)
Free on the web at: http://www.swrb.com/newslett/actualnls/Paleo.htm
Terms of Ministerial and Christian
Communion in the Reformed Presbyterian Church, and In Our Day, In the Puritan Reformed
Church; With Explanatory Dialogue (Including "The Biblical and Logical
Necessity of Uninspired Creeds") by Larry Birger
Though not originally written with Brian Schwertley in mind, in the providence
of God Birger's work has come at a crucial time. This delightful dialogue,
between Hans (a paleopresbyterian) and Franz (a neo-turned-paleopresbyterian),
deals with many of the accusations made by Schwertley (a minister in the
Reformed Presbyterian Church of North Ameri ca -- RPCNA) in his recent open letter
against the Puritan Reformed Church ("PRC" -- Edmonton, AB, and
Prince George, BC) and Still Waters Revival Books (SWRB). In the process, this
enjoyable work sets forth in a very clear, easy-to-understand way a number of
the more controversial and misunderstood teachings adopted by the PRC and
promoted by SWR B in their return to the biblical attainments of the Second, or
Covenanted Reformation on the British Isles. The conversation begins with
"The Biblical and Logical Necessity of Uninspired Creeds", where Hans
shows Franz that Franz's rejection of uninspired creeds is itself an uninspired
creed. After several months of study Franz is now interested in joining Hans'
Covenanter church, but has been confused and unsettled by the charges of his
friend (a member of the RPCNA). This RPCNA friend alleges that Hans' church is
a continuation of the "schism" of the "Steelites", and that
they are "basically Papists, putting uninspired works on a par with the
Bible and then abusing (their) church autho rity by requiring faith in the
church, rather than in the word of God." Hans then goes through and
explains pertinent aspects of each term of communion, demonstrating that the
RPCNA friend's (and Schwertley's) charges and objections are entirely
inaccurate, vindicating in the process precious and vital truths of the
Reformation. This easy-reading and mild-mannered dialogue includes an index of
topics discussed and objections raised, and is an excellent introduction to
the true Covenanter position (i.e. the position of the Westminster Assembly and
the Church of Scotland during the Second Reformation) and an effective antidote to the kinds
of unfounded slanders circulated by those lik e Brian Schwertley. This item is
also available as a bound photocopy for $1.99 (US funds)
Free on the web at: http://www.swrb.com/newslett/actualnls/TermsMin.htm
Act, Declaration, And
Testimony, For The Whole Of The Covenanted Reformation, As Attained To, And
Established In, Britain and Ireland; Particularly Betwixt The Years 1638 and
1649, Inclusive. As, Also, Against All The Steps Of Defection From Said
Reformation, Whether In Former Or Later Times, Since The Overthrow Of That
Glorious Work, Down To T his Present Day (1876)
Upholds the original work of the Westminster Assembly and testifies to the
abiding worth and truth formulated in the Westminster family of documents.
Upholds and defends the crown rights of King Jesus in church and state,
denouncing those who would remove the crown from Christ's head by denying His
right to rule (by His law) in both the civil and ecclesiastical spheres.
Testifies to the received doctrine, government, worship, and discipline of the
Church of Scotland in her purest (reforming) periods. Applies God's Word to the
Church's corporate attainments "with a judicial approbation of the earnest
contendings and attainments of the faithful, and a strong and pointed judicial
condemnation of error and the promoters thereof" (The Original
Covenanter and Contending Witness,
Dec. 17/93, p. 558, http://www.swrb.com/catalog/C.htm.). Shows the church's great historical
victories (such as the National and Solemn League and Covenant, leading to the
Westminster Assembly) a nd exposes her enemies actions (e.g. the Prelacy of
Laud; the Independency, sectarianism, covenant breaking and ungodly toleration
set forth by the likes of Cromwell [and the Independents that conspired with
him]; the Erastianism and civil sectarianism of William of Orange, etc.). It is
not likely that you will find a more consistent working out o f the principles
of Calvinism anywhere. Deals with the most important matters relating to the
individual, the family, the church and the state. Sets forth a faithful
historical testimony of God's dealings with men during some of the most
important days of church history. A basic text that should be mastered by all
Christians.
On sale at: http://www.swrb.com/catalog/R.htm
The Covenanted Reformation
Defended by Greg Barrow is also offered FREE in etext (with navigational
enhancements and in various formats) at:
http://www.reformedpresbytery.org/books/index.html
PDF
Document (913KB) http://www.reformedpresbytery.org/books/covrefdf/covrefdf.pdf
ZIP
File (771KB) http://www.reformedpresbytery.org/books/covrefdf/covrefdf.zip
Single
Web Page (Entire Book) (999KB) http://www.reformedpresbytery.org/books/covrefdf/covrefdf.htm
Split-Up
Web Page (Frames w/Index) http://www.reformedpresbytery.org/books/covrefdf/covrefdf2.htm
Chapter three from this book,
"How the Solemn League & Covenant Binds the USA, Canada, Australia,
etc., Today," is now FREE in MP3 AUDIO in three
parts at:
http://www.sermonaudio.com/swrb or directly at:
How the Solemn League & Covenant Binds the USA, Canada,
Australia, etc., Today (1/3)
FREE MP3 AUDIO: http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sermonid=8501203653
How the Solemn League & Covenant Binds the USA, Canada,
Australia, etc., Today (2/3)
FREE MP3 AUDIO: http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sermonid=860142156
How the Solemn League & Covenant Binds the USA, Canada,
Australia, etc., Today (3/3)
FREE MP3 AUDIO: http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sermonid=870115250
MORE FREE MP3 AUDIO FROM THIS BOOK!
DEBATE on the Meaning of the Church in Reformation Thought by Greg Barrow
Covers some of the most important (and often forgotten, in our day) aspects of
the Reformation doctrine of the church (championed by Calvin, Knox, et al.).
Includes many citations from Reformation leaders & confessional statements
of the best Reformed churches. This is chapter 2 in Greg Barrow's The Covenanted Reformation Defended
(free at: http://www.swrb.com/newslett/actualnls/misrep2.htm).
This
FREE audio MP3 is at: http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sermonid=11250123955
Eschewing Ecclesiastical Tyranny (Protestant Biblical Separation)
by Greg Barrow (DEBATE with Richard Bacon) 1 Corinthians 2:15
The
classic Reformation position on biblical separation, Protestant private
judgment, the visible church, etc. -- contra Antichrist (the Papacy) and
wayward liberal Protestants. This is appendix G from The
Covenanted Reformation Defended: "A
brief examination of Mr. Bacon's principles regarding the visible church and
the use of private judgment. Also, some observations regarding his ignoble
attack upon Mr. Kevin Reed in his book entitled The Visible Church in the Outer
Darkness."
This
FREE audio MP3 is at: http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sermonid=7702201426
Protestant Antidote to Modern Disunity (1/5)
by Greg Barrow (DEBATE with Richard Bacon)
Defection
from Reformation teaching on separation, unity, church membership, church
government, terms of communion, creeds, confessions, covenants, etc., exposed
(in modern Presbyterian and Reformed churches) and corrected in accordance with
Scripture and the best teachers and preachers of the (first and second)
Protestant Reformations. This is chapter four from the book The Covenanted Reformation Defended: "Misrepresentation #4: The
Puritan Reformed Church of Edmonton (PRCE) is guilty of imposing the traditions
of men upon the conscience by requiring terms of communion that are
unscriptural."
Free
etext: http://www.swrb.com/newslett/actualnls/append_g.htm. Book: http://www.swrb.com/catalog/b.htm, or on CD: http://www.swrb.com/Puritan/reformation-bookshelf-CDs.htm.
This
FREE MP3 AUDIO is at:
Protestant Antidote to Modern Disunity (1/5)
http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sermonid=81202235217
Protestant Antidote to Modern Disunity (2/5)
http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sermonID=8130218525
Protestant Antidote to Modern Disunity (3/5)
http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sermonID=815022132
Tapes
four and five in this series can also be accessed through the URLs above (as
they are added to our free MP3 audio on this site).
This book and the FREE MP3 audio tracks noted
above are available on various CDs in both the PURITAN
BOOKSEHLF CD series (http://www.swrb.com/Puritan/puritan-bookshelf-CDs.htm) and the REFORMATION BOOKSHELF CD series (http://www.swrb.com/Puritan/reformation-bookshelf-CDs.htm). See the URLs cited
for more details.
Still Waters Revival Books
(Reformation resources
[books, CDs and more] at great discounts!)
Email: swrb@swrb.com
Home page at: http://www.swrb.com
More FREE MP3 AUDIO, defending
Calvinism against Arminianism and Roman Catholic teaching, by John Calvin,
Martin Luther, William Tyndale and many other Reformation Authors, is at: http://www.sermonaudio.com/swrb
Still
Waters Revival Books (www.swrb.com)
Discount Puritan and Reformed Christian book distributors
serving Christians worldwide (in over 100 countries) for 26+ years.
[Reformation Bookshelf
CDs][Bibles][Books][Music-Psalters-CDs][Sermons & Books on Cassette][Rare Bound Photocopies][Videos][Newsletters][Reformed Children's Books][Super Sales][Free Puritan Books and MP3s]
For SECURE
ONLINE ORDERING (click here)
CLICK HERE TO SEARCH SWRB's COMPLETE SITE
Postage
and handling chart, how to order, etc.
CONTACT Still Waters Revival Books:
Email swrb@swrb.com, Phone 780-450-3730, FAX
780-468-1096, Mail 4710-37A Ave. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6L 3T5
Add yourself to our SUPER SPECIAL email list by sending an email
to add@swrb.com -- for email notices of our best
time-limited sales, new releases, and new FREEBIES (i.e. new FREE etext and new
FREE MP3 audio sermons and classic Reformed books read on tape). Your email
address will be kept private (as we do not sell or trade email addresses in any
way) and you may remove yourself from the list at any time -- as easy (one
email) remove instructions come with every email. This is also a double
opt-in email list, so we
will email you to confirm your email address and to confirm that you want to
join our list. A small selection of previous email sales may be viewed at EMAIL SUPER SPECIALS (http://www.swrb.com/puritan-books.htm). Thank you for visiting our site and we
hope that you find it to be a great blessing!
Puritan
Hard Drive - Calvinism
and the Sovereignty of God - CALVINISM
HD COLLECTION
The Ultimate Conspiracy - Dave Hunt and the Jesuit Attempt to Hijack the Christian Faith